Review of Planned Development District

Disclaimer

Review of Part 5 of the proposed zoning text as it appeared on the ZRC website as of June 16, 2010, at the time it was turned over by the ZRC to the Town Board.  General comments appear in italics, like this.  Comments specifically related to applicability of this document to the HRVR project appear in bold italics.

Section §75-26.4
Planned Development District
ROUGH DRAFT

The current Town Code has a Section 75-26, which addresses "Residential Cluster Development".  The title above says this new Part 5 is to be §75-26.4, but there are no other 'point' sections in Section 75-26 (or elsewhere in the Code) and the line below says this document includes §75-26.1, which conflicts with the above.  In any case, the numbering needs to be consistent with the current Code.

The following pages include proposed new section §75-26.1 of the zoning code.

The purpose of these proposed edits is:

Text shown is proposed new code, unless noted otherwise.

§75-26 Planned Development District

Again, there is already a §75-26, so this is confusing.  Is this Part 5 intended to replace the entire current §75-26?  Assuming the answer is "yes", the following comments apply:

A. Purpose. The Planned Development District (PDD) is intended to encourage creative, compact development while fostering community amenities such as a usable open space system for residents and nearby neighborhoods throughout the town. Approved Planned Development Districts are permitted in order to address the unique environmental, physical and cultural resources of the project area and neighborhood through a customized, site-specific development plan and accompanying regulatory framework.

Where a PDD rezoning is deemed appropriate by the Town, the conventional use and dimensional requirements set forth by other sections of this Local Law are replaced by an approval process in which an approved Development Plan becomes the basis for continuing land use review and approvals.

B. Boundaries. The PDD district is a floating district which is not currently shown on the Zoning Map. Landowners who wish to develop according to the provisions of this section may apply to the Town Board for a zoning map amendment to rezone their land PDD. The Town Board has the sole discretion whether or not to approve such a rezoning based on its merits, overall benefits to the Town and consistency with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.

C. General Criteria. The legislative determination to establish a Planned Development District shall be based upon the following standards:

  1. Location. A Planned Development District (PDD) may be established at any location within the Town, except within the A-1 or I-1 Districts, if the objectives and provisions of this article are satisfied as determined by the Town Board.

    §75-4 of the Code says that A-1 is for mobile home parks.  Why should such a zone be excepted from being converted to a PDD?  Was this perhaps supposed to except zone A, which is "Residential and Open Space Uses"?  If not, including zone A among those eligible for a PDD floating zone substantially reduces the protection currently afforded to existing adjacent owners in the A zone.

  2. Developable Area. The minimum development area required to qualify for a Planned Development District shall be twenty (20) adjacent acres of land in the case of residential or general use, and ten (10) adjacent acres in the case of commercial uses. The calculation of such land area shall not include existing streets, easements, parks, or otherwise dedicated land or water areas in excess of five percent (5%) of the minimum gross acreage, lands designated on the official map for public purposes, or lands undevelopable by reasons of topography, drainage, periodic inundation by flood waters, or adverse sub-soil conditions.
  3. Ownership. The tract of land for a PDD project may be owned, leased or controlled either by a single person or corporation, or by a group of individuals or corporations. An application must be filed by the owner or jointly by the owners of all property included in the project or contract vendee(s) or holder of bona fide purchase option. In the case of multiple ownership, the approved plan and all amendments shall be binding on all owners and all successors in title and interest.
  4. Common Property. When common property exists, the ownership of such property may either be public or private. For private ownership, satisfactory arrangements must be made for the improvements, operation and maintenance of such common property and facilities, including private streets, drives service Should there be a comma between 'drives' and 'service'?  If not, I don't understand the phrase 'drives service'. and parking areas and recreational / open space areas.

    "Satisfactory arrangements" is rather vague.  This seems to mean "satisfactory to the current Town Board".  Should there be specific criteria for determining if the arrangments are satisfactory, such as evidence of long-term financial ability on the part of the owners?

D. Permitted Uses in PD Districts. The classification and mix of uses permitted within an area designated as a PD District shall be determined by the provisions of this section and the approved plan of the project concerned. During consideration of the rezoning request, the Town Board may determine that specific uses are inappropriate for certain locations of town and establish a refined list on a case-by-case basis. This final list would be established for each PD application and included in the PD District Legislation and SEQR findings statement.

  1. For a PD District which occurs through the rezoning of residential lands, the approvable land uses shall be restricted to the following:

    Under current zoning, 12 of the uses proposed by HRVR would not be permitted without either a Special Permit or a Variance.  It appears that all 12 of those uses (including attached single-family homes) would be allowed within a PDD as defined above.

  2. For a PD District created through the rezoning of non-residential lands, the approvable land uses shall be restricted to the following:

E. Conservation analysis requirement. For any PDD application within lands heretofore zoned in primarily residential districts, the applicant shall prepare a Resource Analysis Map of the property as described in §75-26 E(1)(a)[1] There is no such section, either in the current Code or this document.. Such analysis shall be submitted to the Town Board for review in conjunction with their submission of a proposed Development Plan.

F. Intensity of residential land uses. In order to provide additional amenities to the town, and prior to incentives or bonuses, the residential density allowed within a Planned Development District shall be determined according to the following standards:

The above is very confusing.  If I understand it (which is by no means certain), better wording might be something like, "In exchange for a development plan which includes amenities available to Town residents at large (as contrasted with occupants of the development), the Town Board may opt to relax the residential density criteria described elsewhere in this Code.  In so doing, the Town Board is constrained by the following standards:"

  1. Where a Planned Development District occurs by a rezoning of a prior residential district, the density shall not exceed the base density otherwise permitted per developable area in the "Density Control Schedule" for that district. The project amenity package will be considered for potential incentive to allow an increased density and/or smaller lot size per developable area above that base density.

    The two prior sentences seem to contradict each other.  The first says "shall not exceed", while the second says "to allow an increased density".  I think what is intended is to say that the Density Control Schedule establishes a starting point from which incentives, i.e. increased density, will be considered (in exchange for amenities).

  2. Where a Planned Development District occurs by a rezoning of a prior non-residential district, the base residential density shall not exceed four (4) units per acre of developable area which shall also exclude areas used for nonresidential uses. Allowance of and any increases in residential density per developable area above the base shall be determined on the amenity package provided as part of the planned development.
  3. Increase or bonus in density and/or change in permitted land use provided by the town in the PDD shall be commensurate with the amenity or benefit provided. As a general guideline, the amenity package proposed must be commensurate with any density increase or use change proposed, based on each additional unit beyond the base or allowed residential density and/or per 1,000 square feet of previously not permitted nonresidential (e.g., commercial) use. The Town Board may establish and maintain a required amenity schedule which outlines cash or equivalent reimbursements.

    The HRVR plan includes attached single-family homes, which would not normally be permitted in a Residence A zone.  It is not clear whether a change from detached to attached residences constitutes a density increase or a change in usage.  If the latter (which seems likely, based on the Use chart), the above paragraph needs to be clarified.

  4. Amenity package shall include provision of on-site and/or off-site amenities beyond measures required to service the needs of the subject project and/or beyond the measures needed to mitigate the impact of the proposed project. The amenities may include but not be limited to the following:
  5. This paragraph is incorrectly numbered '4' in the original document. Where the Town Board determines that a suitable community benefit or amenity is not immediately feasible, or otherwise not practical, the board may require, in lieu thereof, a payment to the town of a sum to be determined by the board. These funds shall be deposited in a trust fund to be used by the town board exclusively for community benefits or amenities as defined herein.

    The inclusion of roadways in 4(e) above raises a yellow flag.  Repaving an existing deteriorated roadway, or shoring up one that is sliding into a creek, would normally be considered part of the Town highway budget.  This wording would allow cash provided by a PDD developer to be diverted to such purposes, which probably does not meet the intent of providing or enhancing 'community benefits or amenities as defined herein'. 

G. Requirements for specific uses.

This entire section is unclear,  It appears to say something like, 'If your project falls into any of the classes listed below, then the additional requirements listed under that class apply to it."  The three categories are not well defined.
Why would a developer of residential housing designate it as 'affordable', thus triggering the restrictions below?
If I have affordable housing and a small grocery, does that become 'mixed residential and commercial"?  If so, is my housing then restricted to the space above the grocery?

  1. Mixed Use Residential and Commercial.

    'Commercial' does not seem to be defined in the Code.  Would a restaurant be considered commercial?  Does the answer change if the restaurant is within or adjacent to a hotel under the same ownership (see below)?

    Perhaps what was intended was, "Within commercial space, residential housing units may only be provided on the upper floors unless otherwise approved by the Planning Board."
    Why are the categories here different from those in the 'Permitted Uses' section (D)?

  2. Affordable Housing.
  3. Hotel and Resort.

The three categories don't seem to cover all of the permutations.  What about a hotel / spa with a significant percentage of the land area devoted to private residences, and including a public restaurant? 

H. Establishment of a planned development district.

  1. Application for establishment of a planned development district shall be made in writing to the Town Board. Application shall be made by the owner(s) of the land(s) to be included in the district or by a person or persons holding an option to purchase the lands contingent only upon approval of the application for the change of zone. In the event an application is made by a person or persons holding an option to purchase the lands, the application shall be accompanied by a statement signed by all owners of such land indicating concurrence with the application.

    I would strengthen the last sentence to require that the Town be provided with full copies of any contract under which a developer claims to hold an option to purchase.  The 'contingent only upon approval of the application for the change of zone' is an attempt to cover this, but it would be better to have the complete contract available for review, rather than just taking someone's word for what it says.
    There is a discrepancy between this paragraph and C.(3) Ownership.  That paragraph says the land may be "owned, leased, or controlled" by one or more parties.  H(1), however, refers only to 'owners' or those 'holding an option'.  This does not cover the case where the land is leased or controlled in some other way.  Again, it would be best to require the provision of all documents that provide evidence of control, by whatever means.
    The control of the Williams Lake property by HRVR is unclear.  Title to the property remains with two long-standing companies, of which Anita Peck is (apparently) President.  The Town needs to protect itself from the possibility of unclear ownership and responsibility.

  2. The application must include an Environmental Assessment Form and all necessary documentation to comply with SEQRA. No application shall be deemed complete until a Negative Declaration has been made, or until a Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been accepted by the Town Board, acting as the lead agency, This assumes the Town Board is the lead agency.  That may not always be the case. as satisfactory with respect to scope, content and adequacy. An application shall be accompanied by an application fee as set by the Town Board. All application fees are in addition to any required escrow fees, and do not cover the cost of environmental review. The applicant shall be responsible for the total cost of environmental reviews that are determined to be necessary to meet the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). If the Board requires professional review of the application by a designated private planning, engineering, legal, Local Flood Plain Administrator or other consultants, or if it incurs other extraordinary expense to review documents or conduct special studies in connection with the proposed application, reasonable fees shall be paid for by the applicant and an escrow deposit will be required.
  3. Development Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit a Development Plan of all lands and buildings within the area proposed for development. No application for site plan, special use permit, subdivision, or variance approval shall be reviewed or approved until a Development Plan has been approved by the Town Board in accordance with this chapter. In addition, with the exception of repairs and ordinary building maintenance, no building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any PDD project until a Development Plan has been approved by the Town Board in accordance with this chapter. A Development Plan shall include the following:
  4. The Town Board shall refer the Development Plan and its related documents to the Planning Board and Ulster County Planning Board for review. The Planning Board shall, within 60 days of the date of referral, render either a favorable or an unfavorable report to the Town Board. The Planning Board may request a reasonable extension of time to review the proposal, if needed. If no report has been rendered after 120 days, the applicant may proceed as if a favorable report were given. This provision seems potentially dangerous and no justification for it is provided. A favorable report shall include a recommendation to the Town Board that a public hearing be held for the purpose of considering planned development district districting. It shall be based on the following findings, which shall be included as part of the report:

    Recommend adding "The phasing plan ensures that no portion of the development will be sold or otherwise contracted to residents or operators until all infrastructure required to support that portion is operational."  The intent would be to prevent, for example, sale of a residence or lease of a hotel property, followed by a failure to provide supporting infrastructure, such as sewage treatment, which could leave the Town caught between a non-performing developer and clients.

  5. An unfavorable report shall state clearly the reasons therefore and, if appropriate, point out to the applicant what might be necessary in order to receive a favorable report. The applicant may, within 10 days after receiving an unfavorable report, file a revised application with the Town Board. The Town Board may then determine on its own initiative whether or not it wishes to call a public hearing, or deny the application.
  6. Upon receipt of a favorable report from the Planning Board or upon its own determination subsequent to an appeal from an unfavorable report, the Town Board shall set a date for and conduct a public hearing for the purpose of considering the PD redistricting for the applicant's plan.

    Step 4 required that the Development Plan be referred to the Ulster County Planning Board (in addition to the Town Planning Board).  Where is the provision to respond to any results from that Board's review?

    Such public hearing shall be conducted within 45 days of the receipt of the favorable report or the decision on appeal from an unfavorable report.
  7. If the Town Board grants the planned development district rezoning, the Zoning Map shall be so amended. The Town Board may, if it feels it necessary in order to fully protect the public health, safety and welfare of the community, attach to its zoning resolution any additional conditions or requirements for the applicant to meet. Such requirements may include, but are not confined to, visual and acoustical screening, land use mixes, order of construction and/or occupancy, circulation systems, both vehicular and pedestrian, availability of sites within the area for necessary public services, such as schools, firehouses and libraries, protection of natural and/or historic sites and other such physical or social demands. The Town Board shall state at this time its findings with respect to the land use intensity and any applicable amenity packages.
  8. Planned development district districting shall be conditional upon the following:

I. Subdivision and Site Plan review.

Chapter 60 uses the terms 'sketch plan', 'preliminary plat, and 'final plat' and seems never to use the phrase 'site plan'.  The terminology of this document should reflect that of the existing Code.

  1. Upon approval of the Planned Development District by the Town Board, application shall be made within one hundred and twenty (120) days for approval of all or some portion of the intended development, in accordance with the more specific review requirements of the Town's Land Subdivision Regulations, the Site Plan Review and Approval Procedure contained in Chapter 60, and other applicable regulations.
  2. Conformity with Development Plan required. The Planning Board shall not approve any site plan and/or subdivision within an area covered by an approved Development Plan unless the Board finds that the site plan and/or subdivision is in substantial conformance with the approved plan and any conditions and requirements imposed by the Town Board at the time of its approval.
  3. Building projects within established districts. Application for approval of an additional building project or later phase within an established planned development district shall be made in writing to the Town Board which shall follow the procedures of this section in considering an amendment to a prior approved plan. All further development or phases within a PDD shall conform to the development standards established for that district.
  4. Performance surety. Before granting approval for a building project, the Town Board may require the applicant to furnish a performance bond in connection with the construction involved in the preparation of the building project site and/or in connection with construction of buildings. The amount of such bond and the amount of any liability insurance to be furnished shall be determined by the Town Board.
  5. Other approvals and permits. Before granting approval for a building project, the Town Board may require that evidence of such other approvals by appropriate governmental agencies as are normally required in connection with the collection and disposal of surface and subsurface waters, the collection and disposal of sanitary wastes and the provision of an adequate water supply be submitted to it.
  6. Time limits. If construction work on the proposed building project is not begun within the time limits specified in the building project approval or if such work is not completed within the period of time specified by such building project approval, approval of the project application shall become null and void and all rights therein shall cease unless the Town Board, for good cause, authorizes an extension.
  7. Building permits. Applications for building permits for each structure in a building project shall be made to the Building Department and shall be subject to all rules and regulations of the Town pertaining to the issuance of such building permits.

K. Amendments to Planned Development Districts.

  1. Request for changes in Development Plan. If in the site plan review it becomes apparent that certain elements of the Development Plan, as it has been approved by the Town Board, are unfeasible and in need of significant modification, the applicant shall then present a solution to the Planning Board. The Planning Board shall then determine whether or not the modified site plan is still in keeping with the intent of the zoning resolution. If a negative decision is reached, the site plan shall be denied. The developer may then, if they wish, produce another site plan in conformance with the approved Development Plan. If an affirmative decision is reached, the Planning Board shall so notify the Town Board, stating all of the particulars of the matter and its reasons for feeling the project should be continued as modified. Site plan approval may then be given only with the written consent of the Town Board.
  2. Exemptions. Proposed changes to a previously-established planned development district will be exempt from the formal amendment process if any or all of the following conditions are the only changes proposed:
  3. This paragraph is incorrectly numbered '2' in the original document.  Determination of Amendment. Minor and Major - The Code Enforcement Officer shall determine whether a proposed amendment is a minor or major change to the approved site plan.

L. This paragraph is incorrectly lettered "K" in the original document.  Effect of Conditions. All conditions imposed by the Town Board, including those the performance of which are conditions precedent to the issuance of any permit necessary for the development of any part of the entire site, shall run with the land and shall neither lapse nor be waived as a result of any subsequent change in the tenancy or ownership of any or all of said area. Such conditions shall further be a part of any Certificate of Occupancy or Use issued for any use or structure in such development.

An approved PDD results in modification of the Town zoning code map.  Should it also result in a project-specific addition to the zoning code itself, in which any conditions, including any amenities to be provided, are documented for posterity?  This seems more appropriate than relying on scattered Certificates.  How would a future buyer of the land become aware of such conditions, unless they are included in actual deeds or contracts?

Last updated 8 Jul 2010.

Research index